Home

Add a comment

 

Avatar: pieroxy

Re: JPEG Compression: Is 80 the magic quality - Part 1 - the retina screens

Well, I disagree on both counts. I am not going to design all my websites over a constraint that images should be a multiple of 8 in both dimensions. In other words, I don't want to test the sweet spot of JPEG, I want to test its performance in real life.

Also, PSNR is a measure of the distance between two images. It's cool. What I want is to see whether the images "look" similar or not. I can find two images that look exactly the same and that have a PSNR greater than two other images that look greatly different. In other words, PSNR is a poor approximation of the visual similarity of two images. That's not what I'm looking for. For example, PSNR doesn't take into account the density of a screen when comparing two images while I just showed that it is greatly different at 100dpi vs 200dpi.


Re: JPEG Compression: Is 80 the magic quality - Part 1 - the retina screens


Title
Body
HTML : b, strong, i, em, blockquote, br, p, pre, a href="", ul, ol, li, sub, sup
OpenID Login
Name
E-mail address
Website
Remember me Yes  No 

E-mail addresses are not publicly displayed, so please only leave your e-mail address if you would like to be notified when new comments are added to this blog entry (you can opt-out later).

Home