<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>pieroxy.net - Reeder and its companion apps: Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
    <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html</link>
    <description>Reeder has always been my favorite app for reading my multiple RSS feeds. Simple and elegant, it allows preloading of all your feeds so that you can read them in the subway for example.  RSS feeds are usually short summaries of blog entries, and almost ...</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>pieroxy</copyright>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <managingEditor>pieroxy</managingEditor>
    <dc:date>2021-09-10T13:34:12Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>pieroxy</dc:rights>
    
    <item>
      <title>Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
      <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html#comment1437219605013</link>
      <content:encoded>Here's a few inputs from my humble point of view:

- missed comments about kindle and kobo. If you care that much for offline reading you should really consider either. from my brief testing today, I think instapaper is what works best with kindle (although still a bit far from what I would hope).

- couldn't care less about rss, reeder or all those design little details such as fonts. above all, I care for content and your pros &amp;amp; cons end up being too distractive to me.

- do take a look at the same comparison lifehacker did: http://lifehacker.com/5894995/bookmark-and-read-later-apps-compared-read-it-later-vs-instapaper-vs-readability

- cheers! ;P</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:40:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:pieroxy.net,2014-10-05:pieroxy.net/c/1412501220000/1437219605013</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-07-18T11:40:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reeder and its companion apps: Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
      <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html#comment1416820819147</link>
      <content:encoded>I think you missed it. Maybe it is not well explained. 

It is a mix between content you put in and content they suggest related to what it know about you. They have several extensions for you to bookmark the content, or you can simply copy/paste in the settings page.

I particularly love these two extensions (for chrome):

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/noosfeer/ilmanglmconenelnofcmdhbkpfdmbkco

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/facebook-newsfeed-is-now/mdhngicaijnlkbdpnelijaaglmcmochp</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:pieroxy.net,2014-10-05:pieroxy.net/c/1412501220000/1416820819147</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-11-24T09:20:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reeder and its companion apps: Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
      <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html#comment1416812089122</link>
      <content:encoded>I gave it a quick shot. It looks like those modern reading things that choose your content for you. I just don't understand how to get my content in it. There's no help, the UI is dumbed down to the core and it clearly put form way ahead of content. I like form, but the point of me opening reeder is to read the content I chose.

&lt;p&gt;Unless I missed something, Noosfeer is clearly not something I would consider for my daily news reading.</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:pieroxy.net,2014-10-05:pieroxy.net/c/1412501220000/1416812089122</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-11-24T06:54:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reeder and its companion apps: Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
      <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html#comment1416810865822</link>
      <content:encoded>You are correct, the Readability engine is integrated into Reeder. But for this to work you need to be online, which is rarely my case when reading my RSS feeds, so I barely use it. It may work for others though. Thanks for the tip.</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:34:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:pieroxy.net,2014-10-05:pieroxy.net/c/1412501220000/1416810865822</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-11-24T06:34:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reeder and its companion apps: Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
      <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html#comment1416678441991</link>
      <content:encoded>Hi, Interesting review, thanks.
Note though that you could have mentioned that Reeder itself and alone has Readability support.
In other words, it connects to their API and acts as a client to the service.
And it is actually very good at it, with the advantage to have all in a single app.
I rarely use the original app.</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:47:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:pieroxy.net,2014-10-05:pieroxy.net/c/1412501220000/1416678441991</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-11-22T17:47:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reeder and its companion apps: Readability vs Pocket vs Instapaper</title>
      <link>https://pieroxy.net/blog/2014/10/05/1412501220000.html#comment1416496230178</link>
      <content:encoded>You might want to check Noosfeer. You don't even need to download an app and works neatly!</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:10:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:pieroxy.net,2014-10-05:pieroxy.net/c/1412501220000/1416496230178</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-11-20T15:10:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

