Add a comment

Re: JPEG Compression: Is 80 the magic quality - Part 1 - the retina screens Comment from Carbon on August 13, 2016 2:10:58 AM PDT # Hello, I think it would be a better test to have a 160x160 image as jpeg is based on 8x8 blocks. And if you want to measure the distance between the original and the compresse image you should have a check to PSNR
Re: JPEG Compression: Is 80 the magic quality - Part 1 - the retina screens Comment from Anonymous on April 20, 2024 4:04:42 AM PDT #
Title
Body	HTML : b, strong, i, em, blockquote, br, p, pre, a href="", ul, ol, li, sub, sup
OpenID Login	(Not me?)
Name
E-mail address
Website
Remember me	Yes No
E-mail addresses are not publicly displayed, so please only leave your e-mail address if you would like to be notified when new comments are added to this blog entry (you can opt-out later).

Home

All that is in there is just stuff I made up for the most part. However, the chances that some truth found its way in it are non negligible so this possibility should not be discarded. After all, I usually link to my sources. That said, those sources are most likely probably completely made up as well. You want to make sure it's going to work? Try it out for yourself. Ah, as well, those parts that are not blatantly stolen to others are © Pieroxy. Obviously. And last, but not least, thanks to David Vignoni for his icon set nuvola, to Manfred Klein for his font Stampede and to George Herriman for the work of his life, Krazy Kat.

Add a comment

Re: JPEG Compression: Is 80 the magic quality - Part 1 - the retina screens

Re: JPEG Compression: Is 80 the magic quality - Part 1 - the retina screens